« Anarchisme » : différence entre les versions

From Liberpédia
 
(33 versions intermédiaires par 2 utilisateurs non affichées)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Definition==
L’anarchisme consiste à reconnaître les États comme des organisations criminelles.


:The philosophy of a new social order based on liberty unrestricted by man-made law; the theory that all forms of government rest on violence, and are therefore wrong and harmful, as well as unnecessary.  
Il s’oppose donc principalement à la [[croyance dans le chapeau]].


::[[Emma Goldman]]
Comme toute personne soucieuse du [[Droit]] et de l’[[ordre]], l’anarchiste part de ce constat pour souhaiter la disparition des États — aboutir à l’[[anarchie]] — au même titre qu’il souhaite la disparition de toute autre entreprise criminelle.


:ANARCHISM, the name given to a principle or theory of life and conduct under which society is conceived without government - harmony in such a society being obtained, not by submission to law, or by obedience to any authority, but by free agreements concluded between the various groups, territorial and professional, freely constituted for the sake of production and consumption, as also for the satisfaction of the infinite variety of needs and aspirations of a civilized being. In a society developed on these lines, the voluntary associations which already now begin to cover all the fields of human activity would take a still greater extension so as to substitute themselves for the state in all its functions.
:ANARCHISM: The philosophy of a new social order based on liberty unrestricted by man-made law; the theory that all forms of government rest on violence, and are therefore wrong and harmful, as well as unnecessary.


::[[Piotr Kropotkin]], [http://www.blackcrayon.com/page.jsp/library/britt1910.html Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1910]
::Emma Goldman


==Famous anarchists==
:The State! Always and ever the government and its rulers and operators have been considered above the general moral law. The “Pentagon Papers” are only one recent instance among innumerable instances in history of men, most of whom are perfectly honorable in their private lives, who lie in their teeth before the public. Why? For “reasons of State.” Service to the State is supposed to excuse all actions that would be considered immoral or criminal if committed by “private” citizens. The distinctive feature of libertarians is that they coolly and uncompromisingly apply the general moral law to people acting in their roles as members of the State apparatus. Libertarians make no exceptions. For centuries, the State (or more strictly, individuals acting in their roles as “members of the government”) has cloaked its criminal activity in high-sounding rhetoric. For centuries the State has committed mass murder and called it “war” then ennobled the mass slaughter that “war” involves. For centuries the State has enslaved people into its armed battalions and called it “conscription” in the “national service.” For centuries the State has robbed people at bayonet point and called it “taxation.” In fact, if you wish to know how libertarians regard the State and any of its acts, simply think of the State as a criminal band, and all of the libertarian attitudes will logically fall into place.
:: [[Murray Rothbard]], [https://mises.org/library/new-liberty-libertarian-manifesto For a New Liberty]


* Godwin
== La réalité de l’anarchie ==
* Stirner
 
* Proudhon
Dans la mesure où l’Etat n’a pas de légitimité particulière, il n’a pas d’autorité particulière. De plus, il ne résoud en rien le problème de la pluralité des juridictions pouvant résoudre un conflit [https://mises.org/library/do-we-ever-really-get-out-anarchy].
* Emma Goldman
 
* Gandhi
Ainsi, l’anarchisme n’est pas tant une ''opinion'' sur ce que devrait être la société, qu’il est une ''perception'' sur le fonctionnement actuel du monde : des gangs criminels en conflits, donc aucun n’a d’autorité particulière sinon la loi du plus fort. À partir de là, on peut considérer que nous sommes ''toujours'' en anarchie, avec des types et des degrés de criminalité différents, tout simplement.
* Tolstoy
 
* Bakounin
Le principal problème que les anarchistes tentent de combattre étant, alors, la passivité des victimes vis-à-vis des crimes commis par les hommes de l’État (voir [[Forces du désordre]]).
* Kropotkin
 
* Lysander Spooner
== Anarchistes ==
* Benjamin Tucker
 
* Anselme Bellagarigue
*William Godwin
*Max Stirner
*[[Pierre-Joseph Proudhon]]
*Emma Goldman
*Gandhi
* [[Tolstoï]]
*Mikhaïl Bakounine
*Piotr Kropotkine
*Anselme Bellagarigue
*[[Murray N. Rothbard]]
*[[Murray N. Rothbard]]
*Albert J. Nock
*Albert J. Nock
*[[Hans-Hermann Hoppe]]
*[[Hans-Hermann Hoppe]]
* Wendy McElroy
*Wendy McElroy
*[[Lysander Spooner]] (1808-1887)
*Henry David Thoreau (1817-1862)
*Benjamin Tucker (1854-1939)


== Voir aussi ==
* [[Anarchie]]
* [[Anomie]]
* [[Nihilisme]]
* [[Hypnose]]
* [https://mises.org/library/death-wish-anarcho-communists The Death Wish of the Anarcho-Communists] par [[Murray Rothbard]] (traduction en français, [http://herve.dequengo.free.fr/Rothbard/Articles/Eran_12.htm L’anarcho-communisme])
* [http://www.quebecoislibre.org/000415-2.htm L’anarchisme : entre la tyrannie locale et la folie réactionnaire] par Martin Masse
* [http://laissez-faire.ch/fr/articles/reponse-a-pierre-lemieux-l-etat-moins-justifie-que-jamais/ Réponse à Pierre Lemieux : L’Etat, moins justifié que jamais]
* [[Anarchistes conservateurs]]
* [[Minarchisme]]
* [[Karl Marx]]


[[Category:Politique]]
[[Category:Politique]]
[[Category:Anarchisme classique]]
[[Category:Anarchisme classique]]
[[en:Anarchism]]

Version actuelle datée du 16 December 2021 à 03:24

L’anarchisme consiste à reconnaître les États comme des organisations criminelles.

Il s’oppose donc principalement à la croyance dans le chapeau.

Comme toute personne soucieuse du Droit et de l’ordre, l’anarchiste part de ce constat pour souhaiter la disparition des États — aboutir à l’anarchie — au même titre qu’il souhaite la disparition de toute autre entreprise criminelle.

ANARCHISM: The philosophy of a new social order based on liberty unrestricted by man-made law; the theory that all forms of government rest on violence, and are therefore wrong and harmful, as well as unnecessary.
Emma Goldman
The State! Always and ever the government and its rulers and operators have been considered above the general moral law. The “Pentagon Papers” are only one recent instance among innumerable instances in history of men, most of whom are perfectly honorable in their private lives, who lie in their teeth before the public. Why? For “reasons of State.” Service to the State is supposed to excuse all actions that would be considered immoral or criminal if committed by “private” citizens. The distinctive feature of libertarians is that they coolly and uncompromisingly apply the general moral law to people acting in their roles as members of the State apparatus. Libertarians make no exceptions. For centuries, the State (or more strictly, individuals acting in their roles as “members of the government”) has cloaked its criminal activity in high-sounding rhetoric. For centuries the State has committed mass murder and called it “war” then ennobled the mass slaughter that “war” involves. For centuries the State has enslaved people into its armed battalions and called it “conscription” in the “national service.” For centuries the State has robbed people at bayonet point and called it “taxation.” In fact, if you wish to know how libertarians regard the State and any of its acts, simply think of the State as a criminal band, and all of the libertarian attitudes will logically fall into place.
Murray Rothbard, For a New Liberty

La réalité de l’anarchie

Dans la mesure où l’Etat n’a pas de légitimité particulière, il n’a pas d’autorité particulière. De plus, il ne résoud en rien le problème de la pluralité des juridictions pouvant résoudre un conflit [1].

Ainsi, l’anarchisme n’est pas tant une opinion sur ce que devrait être la société, qu’il est une perception sur le fonctionnement actuel du monde : des gangs criminels en conflits, donc aucun n’a d’autorité particulière sinon la loi du plus fort. À partir de là, on peut considérer que nous sommes toujours en anarchie, avec des types et des degrés de criminalité différents, tout simplement.

Le principal problème que les anarchistes tentent de combattre étant, alors, la passivité des victimes vis-à-vis des crimes commis par les hommes de l’État (voir Forces du désordre).

Anarchistes

Voir aussi