« Marxisme culturel » : différence entre les versions
Turion (discussion | contribs) Aucun résumé des modifications |
Turion (discussion | contribs) m (→Exemples) |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
* http://h16free.com/2014/04/01/30201-il-y-a-33-ans-deja | * http://h16free.com/2014/04/01/30201-il-y-a-33-ans-deja | ||
* I believe the answer is that we should learn from our enemies; we should imitate the strategy of the Socialist party of | * I believe the answer is that we should learn from our enemies; we should imitate the strategy of the Socialist party of 60 years ago. Its presidential vote never reached a million, but it may have been the most successful political party in American history. It never gained control over anything larger than the city of Milwaukee but it succeeded in enacting into law virtually every economic proposal in its 1928 platform—a list of radical proposals ranging from minimum wages to social security. | ||
60 years ago. Its presidential vote never reached a million, but it may have been the most successful political party in | :[http://daviddfriedman.com/The_Machinery_of_Freedom_.pdf] | ||
American history. It never gained control over anything larger than the city of Milwaukee but it succeeded in enacting | |||
into law virtually every economic proposal in its 1928 platform—a list of radical proposals ranging from minimum | |||
wages to social security. | |||
http://daviddfriedman.com/The_Machinery_of_Freedom_.pdf | |||
* http://www.redstate.com/diary/Erick/2011/09/21/class-warfare-american-communists-of-1928-compared-to-barack-obama/ | * http://www.redstate.com/diary/Erick/2011/09/21/class-warfare-american-communists-of-1928-compared-to-barack-obama/ | ||
Revision as of 19 September 2016 à 07:36
Le débat politique est précédé d'un débat-culturel, le méta-débat, le cadre conceptuel, ou encore « l'agenda politique », ou la Weltanschauung. En termes marxistes : « l'hégémonie culturelle » ou « l'idéologie dominante ». Le marxisme culturel consiste à modifier ce cadre philosophique de manière subtile, en faveur du collectivisme et du communisme, pour faciliter une éventuelle prise de pouvoir ultérieure.
Hégémonie culturelle
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_hegemony
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqUmJqlMLlM
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFqShpJm_zc
- http://www.evoweb.net/blog2/20150101-kgb.htm
- https://mises.org/blog/cultural-marxism-explained-7-minutes
- https://www.amazon.com/Fools-Frauds-Firebrands-Thinkers-Left-ebook/dp/B0161JXD7K/
- https://mises.org/library/menace-egalitarianism
- https://mises.org/events/mises-circle-dallas-fort-worth
- http://panampost.com/belen-marty/2014/06/09/argentina-creates-ministry-of-truth/
Activitié du KGB
Exemples
On peut citer comme victoires du marxisme culturel l'adoption de mesures communistes, sans prise de pouvoir formelle des partis communistes :
- http://h16free.com/2014/04/01/30201-il-y-a-33-ans-deja
- I believe the answer is that we should learn from our enemies; we should imitate the strategy of the Socialist party of 60 years ago. Its presidential vote never reached a million, but it may have been the most successful political party in American history. It never gained control over anything larger than the city of Milwaukee but it succeeded in enacting into law virtually every economic proposal in its 1928 platform—a list of radical proposals ranging from minimum wages to social security.
Idiots utiles
Les idiots utiles sont ceux qui participent au marxisme culturel en l'acceptant naïvement en tant que tel, en prenant pour argent comptant ses thèses sans comprendre qu'il s'agit d'un instrument idéologique visant un objectif ultérieur.
Qui en profite vraiment ? Voir L'analyse de classe marxiste et celle des Autrichiens. À long terme, de par la loi de Bitur-Camember, nous pouvons soutenir que peu de monde va vraiment en profiter, autrement dit beaucoup d'idiots utiles pour peu de profiteurs réels.
