« Libéralisme strict » : différence entre les versions
From Liberpédia
Turion (discussion | contribs) Aucun résumé des modifications |
Turion (discussion | contribs) Aucun résumé des modifications |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
:I suggest that two basic propositions, one logical and one moral, suffice to construct a new, stricter, liberal doctrine capable of defending its | :I suggest that two basic propositions, one logical and one moral, suffice to construct a new, stricter, liberal doctrine capable of defending its identity: one is the presumption of freedom, the other the rejection of the rules of submission that imply the obligation of political obedience. | ||
identity: one is the presumption of freedom, the other the rejection of the rules of submission that imply the obligation of political obedience. | |||
::Anthony de Jasay, Liberalism, Loose or Strict, The Independent Review, Vol. 9, No. 3, Winter 2005. [http://www.independent.org/publications/tir/article.asp?issueID=40&articleID=505] | ::Anthony de Jasay, Liberalism, Loose or Strict, The Independent Review, Vol. 9, No. 3, Winter 2005. [http://www.independent.org/publications/tir/article.asp?issueID=40&articleID=505] | ||
Version actuelle datée du 28 January 2007 à 06:00
- I suggest that two basic propositions, one logical and one moral, suffice to construct a new, stricter, liberal doctrine capable of defending its identity: one is the presumption of freedom, the other the rejection of the rules of submission that imply the obligation of political obedience.
- Anthony de Jasay, Liberalism, Loose or Strict, The Independent Review, Vol. 9, No. 3, Winter 2005. [1]
