« František Čuhel » : différence entre les versions
From Liberpédia
Turion (discussion | contribs) Aucun résumé des modifications |
Turion (discussion | contribs) Aucun résumé des modifications |
||
| (26 versions intermédiaires par 2 utilisateurs non affichées) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
František Čuhel, également connu sous la forme germanisée Franz Cuhel | František Čuhel, également connu sous la forme germanisée Franz Cuhel est un économiste tchèque de l’[[école autrichienne]] (1862-1914). | ||
:The science of the last forty years may not simply be ignored. Today one may no longer be satisfied with a cursory consideration of Menger and Böhm-Bawerk; one must also be familiar with Pareto and have read Cuhel and Strigl, not to mention the most recent works in this field. | |||
::Ludwig von Mises [https://mises.org/library/epistemological-problems-economics/html/c/149] | |||
Il a contribué à la théorie autrichienne de la [[valeur]] et de l’ordinalité des préférences, il a notamment été le premier à critiquer la théorie des utilités cardinales et des comparaisons interpersonnelles d’utilité. | |||
Rothbard parlera même de la « théorie Cuhel-Mises de l’utilité marginale ordinale ». Murray N. Rothbard, « [https://mises.org/library/money-and-individual Foreword to The Theory of Money and Credit by Mises] », 1981. | |||
: Yet the more radical was the second stage, which grew as a natural conclusion of the previous one. If values are subjective, then it follows that objective measurement is impossible. They cannot be subjected to a truly “scientific” analysis (as in natural sciences). This radical conclusion was put forth by the important Czech economist Franz Čuhel (1907). His insights could be portrayed as deconstructivist for most value theories, for they attacked any price theory which was grounded in utility or value measurements. Čuhel’s sweeping investigation was immediately accepted by Mises as fundamentally sound, despite the fact that value measurements were used by the Austrian School representatives (Mises 1981, p. 54). Although Menger did not use them, his framework did not preclude such possibility. Böhm-Bawerk used utility measurements frequently in his writings. He was even criticized by Čuhel himself and admitted that he only believed in soft measurability of sensations. | |||
::[[Mateusz Machaj]], [https://mises.org/sites/default/files/Theory%20of%20Money%20and%20Fiduciary%20Media.pdf Mises and Value Theory] | |||
== Œuvres == | |||
* [https://archive.org/details/zurlehrevondenbe00cuhe Zur Lehre von den Bedürfnissen: theoretische Untersuchungen über das Grenzgebiet der Ökonomik und der Psychologie], 1907 | |||
* [http://liberpedia.net/t/nppe3_1.pdf K nauce o potřebách] [ [http://liberpedia.net/t/nppe3_1.pdf On the Theory of Needs] ], 1907 | |||
* [https://cs.wikisource.org/wiki/Ott%C5%AFv_slovn%C3%ADk_nau%C4%8Dn%C3%BD/Hodnota auteur de l’entrée « valeur » dans le grand dictionnaire tchèque de 1897] : « ... théorie autrichienne, ou théorie de la valeur marginale.... que nous considérons comme la plus correcte de toutes les théories de la valeur existantes... » | |||
== Articles à propos == | |||
: | === tchèque === | ||
* Marek Hudík, « [http://liberpedia.net/t/nppe3_1.pdf František Čuhel (1862-1914)] » ''New Perspectives on Political Economy'', Volume 3, Number 1, 2007, pp. 3-14. | |||
* « [http://liberpedia.net/t/TL_10_11_2007.pdf 100 Let od vydání Nauky o potřebách Františka Čuhla] », ''Terra Libera'', octobre-novembre 2017. | |||
* Wikipedia CS, [https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franti%C5%A1ek_%C4%8Cuhel František Čuhel] | |||
* Wikisource CS, [https://cs.wikisource.org/wiki/Autor:Franti%C5%A1ek_%C4%8Cuhel František Čuhel] | |||
* [http://aleph.nkp.cz/F/?ccl_term=wau=jk01021935+or+wkw=jk01021935&func=find-c&local_base=skc Databáze Národní knihovny ČR] | |||
=== anglais === | |||
* [[ | * [[Jeffrey Tucker]], « [https://www.aier.org/article/the-marginal-marginalist-from-prague/ The Marginal Marginalist from Prague] » | ||
* [[Jörg Guido Hülsmann]], [https://mises.org/library/mises-last-knight-liberalism-0 Mises: The Last Knight of Liberalism], 2007, pp. 218-219. | * [[Jörg Guido Hülsmann]], ''[https://mises.org/library/mises-last-knight-liberalism-0 Mises: The Last Knight of Liberalism]'', 2007, pp. 218-219. | ||
* | * https://www.google.ch/webhp?q=%22cuhel-mises%22#safe=off&q=%22cuhel-mises%22 | ||
= | === français === | ||
* [ | * [[Josef Šíma]], « Les Tchèques et les idées autrichiennes », in ''Histoire du libéralisme en Europe'', éd. Philippe Nemo et Jean Petitot, PUF, Paris, 2006, p. 1270 . | ||
* Wikibéral, [http://www.wikiberal.org/wiki/Franz_Cuhel Franz Cuhel] | |||
[[en: František Čuhel]] | |||
[[cs: František Čuhel]] | |||
[[de: Franz Cuhel]] | |||
Version actuelle datée du 17 July 2022 à 20:06
František Čuhel, également connu sous la forme germanisée Franz Cuhel est un économiste tchèque de l’école autrichienne (1862-1914).
- The science of the last forty years may not simply be ignored. Today one may no longer be satisfied with a cursory consideration of Menger and Böhm-Bawerk; one must also be familiar with Pareto and have read Cuhel and Strigl, not to mention the most recent works in this field.
- Ludwig von Mises [1]
Il a contribué à la théorie autrichienne de la valeur et de l’ordinalité des préférences, il a notamment été le premier à critiquer la théorie des utilités cardinales et des comparaisons interpersonnelles d’utilité.
Rothbard parlera même de la « théorie Cuhel-Mises de l’utilité marginale ordinale ». Murray N. Rothbard, « Foreword to The Theory of Money and Credit by Mises », 1981.
- Yet the more radical was the second stage, which grew as a natural conclusion of the previous one. If values are subjective, then it follows that objective measurement is impossible. They cannot be subjected to a truly “scientific” analysis (as in natural sciences). This radical conclusion was put forth by the important Czech economist Franz Čuhel (1907). His insights could be portrayed as deconstructivist for most value theories, for they attacked any price theory which was grounded in utility or value measurements. Čuhel’s sweeping investigation was immediately accepted by Mises as fundamentally sound, despite the fact that value measurements were used by the Austrian School representatives (Mises 1981, p. 54). Although Menger did not use them, his framework did not preclude such possibility. Böhm-Bawerk used utility measurements frequently in his writings. He was even criticized by Čuhel himself and admitted that he only believed in soft measurability of sensations.
Œuvres
- K nauce o potřebách [ On the Theory of Needs ], 1907
- auteur de l’entrée « valeur » dans le grand dictionnaire tchèque de 1897 : « ... théorie autrichienne, ou théorie de la valeur marginale.... que nous considérons comme la plus correcte de toutes les théories de la valeur existantes... »
Articles à propos
tchèque
- Marek Hudík, « František Čuhel (1862-1914) » New Perspectives on Political Economy, Volume 3, Number 1, 2007, pp. 3-14.
- « 100 Let od vydání Nauky o potřebách Františka Čuhla », Terra Libera, octobre-novembre 2017.
- Wikipedia CS, František Čuhel
- Wikisource CS, František Čuhel
- Databáze Národní knihovny ČR
anglais
- Jeffrey Tucker, « The Marginal Marginalist from Prague »
- Jörg Guido Hülsmann, Mises: The Last Knight of Liberalism, 2007, pp. 218-219.
- https://www.google.ch/webhp?q=%22cuhel-mises%22#safe=off&q=%22cuhel-mises%22
français
- Josef Šíma, « Les Tchèques et les idées autrichiennes », in Histoire du libéralisme en Europe, éd. Philippe Nemo et Jean Petitot, PUF, Paris, 2006, p. 1270 .
- Wikibéral, Franz Cuhel
